Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Genealogy Wiki is based on the concepts developed for the Wikipedia. |
The Genealogy Wiki is based on the concepts developed for the Wikipedia. |
||
− | Keep in mind that others can edit any article created. We depend on good manners, and mutual respect |
+ | Keep in mind that others can edit any article created. We depend on good manners, and mutual respect to resolve different views. If you don't agree with someone's view, as presented in one of these articles, discuss your viewpoint with them. (Use the articles "discussion page) or contact them through their UserPage, or email them!) Work out a compromise that meets both viewpoints. The section "Alternative Viewpoints" is there to assist with the presentation of other viewpoints. If someone has already created an article on a particular person, and you think it should say something different, consider putting your views in "Alternative Viewpoints". If you are starting an article, and know that there are other viewpoints on a particular subject, consider expressing those alternative viewpoints in the "Alternative Viewpoint" section. Nothing improves understanding like trying to make the other guys case. Ultimately, the key admonishion on this is "be polite, courteous, and respectful". You can disagree with someone's viewpoint, and still meet those requirements. |
− | *Use the article's "discussion" page, |
||
− | *Contact them through their UserPage, |
||
− | *Email them! |
||
− | Work out a compromise that meets both viewpoints. The section "Alternative Viewpoints" is there to assist with the presentation of other viewpoints. If someone has already created an article on a particular person, and you think it should say something different, consider putting your views in "Alternative Viewpoints". If you are starting an article, and know that there are other viewpoints on a particular subject, consider expressing those alternative viewpoints in the "Alternative Viewpoint" section. Nothing improves understanding like trying to make the other guy's case. Ultimately, the key admonition on this is "be polite, be courteous, and be respectful". You can disagree with someone's viewpoint, and still meet those admonitions. |
||
− | + | and in the words of our late friend, Jerry Penley |
|
⚫ | |||
− | |||
⚫ | |||
--[[User:WMWillis|Bill]] 23:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC) |
--[[User:WMWillis|Bill]] 23:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
− | |||
− | ''See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Civility'' |
||
− | [[Category:Wigton Walker Administration]] |
||
− | [[category:Policy]] |