Edit Page
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:As I recall, you voted for changing "Category:Settlements established in 1894" to "Category:Settled in 1894", while Afil favoured "Category:Established in 1894". I consider that after Afil has done several thousand pages using his format, with not word from you, that you have given tacit approval to this form. I am sorry I missed it in my table. [[User:Thurstan|Thurstan]] ([[User talk:Thurstan|talk]]) 09:15, April 28, 2013 (UTC) |
:As I recall, you voted for changing "Category:Settlements established in 1894" to "Category:Settled in 1894", while Afil favoured "Category:Established in 1894". I consider that after Afil has done several thousand pages using his format, with not word from you, that you have given tacit approval to this form. I am sorry I missed it in my table. [[User:Thurstan|Thurstan]] ([[User talk:Thurstan|talk]]) 09:15, April 28, 2013 (UTC) |
||
− | |||
− | ::I am 100% certain that I did not vote the way you say I did. And the fact that our energetic friend went his own way without specifically disagreeing with me cannot be taken as my tacit approval - I did not realise what he was doing. I still oppose the merging of settlements with other institutions. Where we differ from WP we should be more precise, not less. -- [[User:Robin Patterson|Robin Patterson]] ([[User talk:Robin Patterson|Talk]]) 08:46, June 2, 2017 (UTC) |
||
− | |||
− | ==Century births etc== |
||
− | Nothing in the table mentions deletion or variation of WP's "..th-century births" categories. But in 2017 one of our experts has been deleting them without apparent replacement (e.g. "Born in the ..th century" - categories that we have). Have I missed a relevant discussion? -- [[User:Robin Patterson|Robin Patterson]] ([[User talk:Robin Patterson|Talk]]) 08:46, June 2, 2017 (UTC) |