Familypedia

Guineapig[]

Klaas may be pleased to know that his page is a test of User:Rtol's revised GEDCOM upload program. — Robin Patterson (Talk) 06:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Errors noticed[]

  1. Children box shows him as both parents. — Robin Patterson (Talk) 06:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Indeed, but the info page is correct. ???? Rtol 09:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Correct in one sense, but it had the article as BASEPAGENAME without subst. Thurstan replaced it with the article name and all's well. But we shouldn't have to do that. Surely that subst had an important function? I've said before that we should have it back until we fix all the problems its absence causes. Seems there are far more problems than were realised by the person(s) who removed it. — Robin Patterson (Talk) 15:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
BASEPAGENAME without subst? I noticed some discussion on this, but did not pay attention. Can you direct me? I also noticed other inexplicable problems, perhaps with the same case. Rtol 16:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)